Color: Military
Blue/Atomic Mango-Venom green-black
Intended
use: On all surfaces except trail. Works for recovery runs, non-competitive
long distance.
Surfaces
tested on: Road, synthetic track 21° C/70° F
Upper: Engineered
mesh, high frequency welded overlays, internal sleeve.
Midsole: Fused dual density foam, Zoom Air bag in forefoot, Nike
plus cavity in leftshoe.
Outsole: Carbon
rubber.
Weight:
324 gms/11.42 Oz for a half pair of US11.
US Retail:
$ 115
From the conventional looking Zoom Structure 15, the sole design
took a quantum evolutionary leap in the 2012 Structure 16, and the same design
carries forward to Zoom Structure 17. Bottom of the shoe is where big shifts
happen, which in much part is buoyed by triumphant success of models like the Nike Lunarglide.
The new
Zoom Structure 17 sheds the traditional high density foam piece and transitions
to a midsole construction which uses two densities of foam fused diagonally
together.
The shoe
uses Zoom Air bags in the forefoot, and what it does is make the forefoot area
very stiff, despite very prominent flex grooves. The sockliner also adds to the
rigidity too; the top layer is a soft foam but is cupped all around (except the
arch area) by a stiff foam, with reinforced areas under the forefoot and heel.
The name ‘Fitsole 2’ is very confusing; the Nike Air Pegasus 30 also featured a
Fitsole 2, but that is made of a completely different material.
This might
mislead runners who liked the memory foam like give of the Pegasus Fitsole 2
sockliner, and assume that Zoom Structure 17 has the same insole. Both are very
different components with the same name, and we’re glad Nike is changing names
on running sockliners starting this Fall. The Air Pegasus 31 is the first to
feature that change.
For fortunate souls who found
the Zoom Structure 16 suitable for their running needs and want to know about
upper changes on the Structure 17, there’s plenty to cheer about. There’s a
mile long list of new updates to the upper design. In a way, it is a Pegasus 29 vs. 30 deja vu all over. The stitched-on synthetic
leather panels of the Zoom Structure 16 have been replaced with thin layers of
fused overlays which show bulky aesthetics the door. The fused panels are used
sparingly, with areas like the toe bumper and eye stay getting most of the
treatment. There are no overlays running across the top of the toe-box;
instead, invisible support stays are heat fused to the upper from beneath to
add structural strength. (see image above).
Sweeping changes happen in
the mid foot area, where the construction upgrades itself to an internal
sleeve. The tongue is now stitched to its sides, getting rid of the ungainly
tongue slide of the Structure 16. Inside the upper, there’s hardly any seam,
except for the tongue gusset and collar attachment, so the fit is superb. The
entire lining forward of the rear foot seam is a foam padded mesh, so there’s a
confidence inspiring sensation of wrap around the foot. The elevated sense of
fit is further heightened by the use of dynamic support straps on the inner
side, giving the arch a nice wrap from base of the upper to the laces. Overall,
the fit is a vast improvement over the 2012 Nike Zoom Structure 16.
If the Zoom Structure 16
worked for you, the 17th version is greatly improved and will make you happier
than the 2012 version. The upper is completely new, the shoe is lightweight,
and the updates addresses many areas where the Structure 16 was found wanting.
But in our viewpoint, the Zoom Structure 17 is a not a shoe we would prefer to
run in. The way the shoe manages pronation does not inspire us, and it
over-corrects footstrike – which we don’t see as healthy. The shoe might have
good intentions – that to correct excessive pronation, but like they say,
you can’t have too much of a good thing.
The Zoom Structure 17 seems
to be a case of overzealous experiment. If you’re out on the streets looking
for a stability shoe which also offers ample cushioning, we recommend that you
either buy the Lunareclipse 4, Asics Kayano 20, or wait for the new Zoom Structure 18 in October.
Unless you were treated well by the Zoom Structure 16 – in that scenario,
there’s no cause for alarm.
No comments:
Post a Comment