Color: Lightning/White-Orange
flash
Intended
use: Recovery runs, long distance. Use on all surfaces except trail.
Surfaces
tested on: Road, 21° C/70° F
Upper:
Spacer mesh, synthetic overlays, welds.
Midsole: Dual
layer EVA, TPU midfoot shank, front and rear Gel cushioning pads.
Outsole:
Carbon rubber in rearfoot, blown rubber in forefoot
Weight:
345 gms/12.16 Oz for a half pair of US11/UK 10/EUR 45
Widths available: D-standard (reviewed), 2E-wide, 4E-extra wide.
Width options in select colors only.
US Retail:
$ 115
The Cumulus 16 is more
flexible in the forefoot than the Nimbus 16, and marginally lighter in weight
too. We see these three factors as upsides over the Nimbus, something which
will swing a lot of otherwise (potential) Nimbus buyers in Cumulus’s favor.
When compared to last year’s Cumulus 15, there is nothing new to report, with
overbearing design similarities and material carry overs passed on to the 16th
edition. The Cumulus 16
continues in the Asics tradition of snail pace evolution.
As far as the ride is
concerned, the Cumulus is quite sorted. The Gel+foam cushioning strikes a fine
balance between softness and stability, allowing rear-foot strike to move
progressively without inducing gait correction. As we pointed out, the
densities are evenly matched on lateral and medial sides, removing the element
of foot strike bias – something which we observed in the Nimbus 16. The damping comes across as being centered in
the heel, and then transitioning smoothly over to the forefoot, helped by the
air foam footbed and the EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate) strobel just below it.
Asics calls it ‘SP45’ foam. Forefoot is well padded; it’s got Gel pads between
two layers of midsole foam, and then blown rubber serving as the outsole. Centered
cushioning also makes the Cumulus stable in heel, an area where it scores over
the Nimbus. Forefoot has a solid plant, with wide flare and great grip coming
from blown rubber underneath. Rear outsole has a familiar geometry of hard
carbon rubber topped EVA pods, complete with a crash pad which acts
independently due to deep grooves all around. In addition to the Gel pads and
midsole foam, the crash pad also adds to cushioning feel during heel strikes –
by temporarily flexing outwards during landing. Forefoot flexibility is high
for this category, and as we highlighted earlier, better than the Nimbus or Kayano.
Upper is a
spacer mesh/weld/synthetic leather medley, no different from what you’ve seen
or experienced on past Cumulus versions and the like. Toe box is made using an
air-mesh which is free standing except for a single ‘bridge’ made of synthetic
leather. It’s a no-sew overlay but has a reinforced stitch running across, with
the obvious intent of keeping that piece from peeling off over time. Lacing is
exactly the same as the 15; pieces of stitched-on synthetic with punched
eyeholes to let the laces pass through. Speaking of laces, they are short, and
there isn’t much of it left at the end. Would have been helpful for them to be
a little longer.
Tongue is traditional, by
which we refer to its un-sleeved construction. As expected of such a design,
tongue ends up moving a bit to one side after a few miles. Not completely, but
it does shift a few millimeters to one side. The Cumulus 16 runs true to size
heel to toe, and does so without jamming the toe forward. The fit is snug in
most places, starting from the forefoot, which is shallow and snugger on the
lateral side than it is on medial. The lateral side has the synthetic band
going over the small toes and extending downwards, which makes that area
slimmer and hence snugger. The medial side is relatively open, with mostly mesh
as a barrier. The ease of fit on the inner side also applies to midfoot, where
it is more relaxed when compared to the form-fitting (outer) side.
With that,
arch support isn’t impressive from an upper standpoint, and that isn’t helped by
the midsole, where there’s no supportive flare.
Collar is
snug because the hard internal heel stiffener is molded narrow, when say
compared to a Nimbus. This reduces the space between the collar walls, which
closes in on the foot with a higher level of grip. The lining on either sides
has decent foam padding too. Some runners will welcome this kind of snugness,
while others might find it a bit overbearing. The Achilles dip is not hard by
any standard, but lacks a soft feel.
The
material package on the Cumulus is average for a $115 shoe. Parts of the shoe,
like the tongue and collar lining, are straight lifts from the $100 GT 1000-2.
They aren’t bad; it is just that they don’t feel very premium. There’s a
certain coarseness, for lack of the right word. It’s all fine when you’re
looking inwards and vertically within the Asics construct; after all, a $150
shoe and a $115 variant have to be sufficiently differentiated by way of
materials.
It’s not
only the materials, but the manufacturing execution also comes across as
mediocre. Glue marks are seen on different areas of the shoe (refer to
picture), and there are signs of imperfections like misaligned midsole and
outsole rubber bonding, and embossing shifts. The reflective strip on heel
works well functionally, but look closer and the fused edge has this waviness.
And while at it, throw in some shoddy levels of stitching, with loose yarns
sprouting out of the upper.
The shoe
is also heavy. It is lighter than the Nimbus at 345 gms, but pit it against the
Ride 7 (292 gms), Pegasus (323 gms) and Ghost 7 (310 gms) and suddenly it
becomes the odd one out. There used to be a time when 350 grams was the
category median for these kind of running shoes, but those days are quickly
coming to an end.
Functionally, the $115 Gel Cumulus is a running shoe with little issues.
It’s got a ride which balances cushioning with stability and the upper also
passes muster, at least structurally Our rating system, which is based purely
on function and filters subjectivity, awards the Cumulus a healthy 8.3/10. It
is just that the shoe is plagued with design inertia, something which a lot of
Asics models seem to be afflicted by. The Cumulus has old school, traditional
shoe elements which will appeal to loyalists who don’t want to see much change.
But when released into the modern day jungle which is the running footwear
market, it struggles hard to make a strong case for itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment